NTAG 224 DNA StatusDetect vs ST25TV

NTAG 224 DNA (ISO 14443-A, 144 bytes) vs ST25TV (ISO 15693, 256 bytes). Compare NFC Type 2 vs Type 5, ECC authentication, tamper detection, and anti-counterfeiting.

Side-by-side specs

Frequency
ST25TV
13.56 MHz
Protocol
NTAG 224 DNA StatusDetect
ISO/IEC 14443-A, NFC Forum Type 2
ST25TV
ISO/IEC 15693, NFC Forum Type 5
Memory
NTAG 224 DNA StatusDetect
144 bytes user memory
ST25TV
256 bytes user memory
Interface
ST25TV
RF (contactless)
Temp Range
ST25TV
-25°C to +85°C
Form Factor
ST25TV
TSSOP8, UFDFPN8
Security
NTAG 224 DNA StatusDetect
AES-128 based originality signature, SUN (Secure Unique NFC) message, tamper status detection, 32-bit password protection, ECC-based authentication
ST25TV
32-bit password protection, tamper detection, originality signature

Verdict

Choose NTAG 224 DNA StatusDetect if you need ISO/IEC 14443-A and NFC Forum Type 2 compliance with advanced anti-counterfeiting security. It provides 144 bytes of user memory and features AES-128 based originality signature, ECC-based authentication for cryptographic verification, and SUN (Secure Unique NFC) message capability that generates dynamic secure URLs. The 32-bit password protection and tamper status detection make it suitable for pharmaceutical authentication, luxury goods protection, and high-value product verification where the stronger ECC-based authentication provides superior protection against cloning. The Type 2 tag structure offers faster read speeds in typical smartphone NFC scenarios and wider compatibility with existing NFC readers optimized for ISO 14443-A. Choose ST25TV if you require ISO/IEC 15693 and NFC Forum Type 5 protocol support with more user memory capacity. It offers 256 bytes of user memory, providing 78% more storage than the NTAG 224 DNA for applications requiring extended data logging or sensor information. The ST25TV includes 32-bit password protection, tamper detection, and originality signature, though it lacks the ECC-based authentication present in the NTAG variant. The ISO 15693 protocol provides longer read range capabilities compared to ISO 14443-A, making it advantageous for logistics tracking, supply chain management, and IoT applications where extended reading distance is needed. The trusted sensing capabilities enable integration with external sensors for temperature monitoring or environmental data collection in secure IoT deployments.

FAQ

What is the difference between NFC Type 2 and Type 5 tags?

NFC Type 2 tags use ISO 14443-A protocol with typical read ranges of 2-4 cm and faster data transfer, while Type 5 tags use ISO 15693 protocol offering extended read ranges up to 1 meter but slower data rates. Type 2 tags like NTAG 224 DNA have broader smartphone compatibility, while Type 5 tags like ST25TV excel in industrial and logistics applications.

Does NTAG 224 DNA or ST25TV have stronger authentication?

NTAG 224 DNA StatusDetect has stronger authentication with ECC-based cryptographic verification and AES-128 based originality signature, while ST25TV offers originality signature and tamper detection without ECC authentication. The NTAG's SUN message capability provides dynamic secure authentication that ST25TV lacks.

Which chip has more memory for user data?

ST25TV provides 256 bytes of user memory compared to NTAG 224 DNA StatusDetect's 144 bytes, offering 112 bytes (78%) more storage capacity for applications requiring extended data logging or sensor information.

Sourcing NTAG 224 DNA StatusDetect or ST25TV in volume?

Roxtron builds custom RFID and NFC products around both NTAG 224 DNA StatusDetect and ST25TV. Tell us your project — quantities, form factor, timeline — and we'll come back within 24 hours with pricing and lead times.