NTAG 426Q vs ST25TV64K
Compare NTAG 426Q's AES-128 authentication and 416 bytes with ST25TV64K's 8192 bytes and ISO 15693. Different protocols, memory, and security for NFC tagging.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | NTAG 426Q | ST25TV64K |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency | 13.56 MHz | 13.56 MHz |
| Protocol | ISO/IEC 14443-A, NFC Forum Type 2 compliant | ISO/IEC 15693, NFC Forum Type 5 |
| Memory | 416 bytes user memory / 1024 bytes total EEPROM | 64 Kbit (8192 bytes) EEPROM |
| Interface | RF (contactless) | RF (contactless) |
| Temp Range | -25°C to +85°C | -25°C to +85°C |
| Form Factor | Wafer, VQFN48, HVQFN32 | SO8, TSSOP8, UFDFPN8 |
| Security | AES-128 mutual authentication, SUN (Secure Unique NFC) message with encrypted CMAC, tamper detection, originality signature, 32-bit password protection | 32-bit password protection, tamper detection loop, originality signature |
Verdict
FAQ
What is the memory difference between NTAG 426Q and ST25TV64K?
NTAG 426Q provides 416 bytes of user memory from 1024 bytes total EEPROM, while ST25TV64K offers 8192 bytes (64 Kbit) of EEPROM—approximately 20 times more storage capacity.
Which chip has better security NTAG 426Q or ST25TV64K?
NTAG 426Q offers stronger security with AES-128 mutual authentication, encrypted CMAC, and SUN messaging, while ST25TV64K uses 32-bit password protection. Both include tamper detection and originality signatures, but NTAG 426Q provides cryptographic authentication.
Are NTAG 426Q and ST25TV64K compatible with the same readers?
No, NTAG 426Q uses ISO/IEC 14443-A (NFC Type 2) while ST25TV64K uses ISO/IEC 15693 (NFC Type 5). They require different protocol support, though many modern NFC readers support both standards.
Sourcing NTAG 426Q or ST25TV64K in volume?
Roxtron builds custom RFID and NFC products around both NTAG 426Q and ST25TV64K. Tell us your project — quantities, form factor, timeline — and we'll come back within 24 hours with pricing and lead times.